Skip to main content
[email protected]WhatsApp : +91 91063 65667Open Access Journal|Peer-Reviewed|Multidisciplinary|Research for a Better Tomorrow.ISSN 2984-8911ESTD 2023
JMVRA logoJMVRA – ISSN 2984-8911Journal of Modern and Versatile Research ApproachPeer ReviewedESTD 2023Open AccessCrossref DOI Submit Paper

JMVRA Home Journal Blog Choosing a Journal

Reading a Turnitin Similarity Report Correctly

An explanation of how Turnitin and iThenticate work, what a similarity percentage tells you, what can be excluded, how to resolve overlaps, and why a low score does not prove originality.

Article kindGuide Revised on Approx. read time5 min CategoryChoosing a Journal

JMVRA at a glance

  • ISSN2984-8911
  • FrequencyMonthly
  • AccessOpen access · CC BY 4.0
  • EstablishedJune 2023
  • Fee, after acceptance₹971 INR Indian · $41 USD foreign
  • Email[email protected]
  • WhatsApp+91 91063 65667
Submit Paper
Reading a Similarity Report — JMVRA guide banner

These days the majority of journals pass each submission through similarity software like Turnitin or iThenticate, and a number of them turn down manuscripts on the strength of the report alone. Still, authors frequently misread it. A percentage is no final judgement, and a small figure does not demonstrate originality. Studying the report carefully before submission is among the quickest ways to prevent delays.

Reading a similarity report before you submit. Software: How it works — Text compared with a large database. Percent: What it means — Matching text, not proven plagiarism. Exclude: What editors skip — Quotes, references, small matches. Fix: The right way — Quote, paraphrase properly, cite. JMVRA: transparent, double-blind peer review · open access CC BY 4.0 · ISSN 2984-8911 ₹971 INR / $41 USD only after acceptance, up to 5 authors · Crossref DOI on request
The percentage only opens the discussion — the individual matches are what count — tap to enlarge.

The Way Similarity Software Operates

Your text is checked against a huge collection of published articles, web pages and earlier submissions, and passages that match are flagged along with where they came from. You get a total similarity percentage plus a list of matches. What it finds is overlapping text, not plagiarism itself; deciding whether the overlap is a problem is up to an editor. Treat the report as a prompt for questions rather than an answer.

Interpreting the Percentage

How to read a similarity report
PatternUsually meansAction
Numerous small matches scattered through the paperEveryday phrases and standard terminologyUsually fine
A single large block that matches one sourceCopied or reused textRewrite and cite
Heavy overlap with your own thesis or earlier paperSelf-reuseRewrite, cite, disclose
Matches in references and methods boilerplateExpectedEditors often leave these out

What Editors Commonly Leave Out

  • The reference list
  • Quoted material in quotation marks with citation
  • Very small matches (for example under 8–10 words)
  • Standard method descriptions — though you should still paraphrase where you can

The Correct Way to Fix Overlaps

  1. Trace the origin of every large match. Does it come from another author, or from your own earlier writing?
  2. Put it in your own words. Alter the structure and phrasing instead of swapping a handful of synonyms.
  3. Credit every source you drew on. Restating an idea without a citation is still plagiarism.
  4. Declare prior versions. When the paper grows out of your thesis or a conference paper, mention that in the cover letter.

Why a Low Score Does Not Prove Originality

Paraphrasing tools and translated passages can conceal borrowed ideas from similarity software. Journals also look out for altered text, invented data and duplicated images. Being original means the ideas, data and wording are yours, or that any use of others’ work is clearly credited. A clean score therefore says little about the integrity of the research itself.

Avoid using “paraphrasing” tools to push a similarity score down. Editors spot the awkward wording they generate, and the result may be rejection or retraction.

AI Writing and Similarity Checks

Text produced by AI may not match any existing source and can therefore get through similarity checks, yet a lot of journals now ask you to declare any AI use and keep you accountable for accuracy and originality. Obey the journal’s AI policy, and never allow a tool to make up references.

Rewriting a Matched Passage: Before and After

Paraphrasing example
VersionText
Original source“Fly ash improves the long-term compressive strength of concrete due to its pozzolanic activity.”
Poor rewrite (synonym swap)“Fly ash enhances the long-term compressive strength of concrete owing to its pozzolanic action.”
Good rewrite (own words + citation)“Because fly ash reacts slowly with calcium hydroxide, its contribution to concrete strength appears mainly at later ages [12].”

The better version reshapes the idea, explains the reasoning and cites its source. Simply swapping synonyms still matches the original and is still regarded as copying.

The 10 Most-Searched Questions on This Topic

Here are the ten questions researchers search for most on this subject, each with a direct answer.

  1. Turnitin checked journal

    A journal that checks submissions using Turnitin or iThenticate similarity software.

  2. acceptable similarity percentage for journal

    No single figure applies everywhere; editors consider where the matches fall as well as the overall total.

  3. iThenticate vs Turnitin

    Both rely on Turnitin’s technology, with iThenticate being the edition built for publishers and researchers.

  4. how to reduce similarity index

    Put matched passages into your own words and cite your sources correctly.

  5. self plagiarism in research paper

    Using your own published or submitted text again without citing or disclosing it.

  6. exclude references Turnitin

    The reference list and quoted material are frequently left out of the score by editors.

  7. paraphrasing tool plagiarism

    Hiding copied text with software counts as misconduct and can often be detected.

  8. thesis to journal similarity

    Reword the text and state that the paper is based on your thesis.

  9. rapid publishing peer reviewed journal

    Well-run journals check similarity at the start, so a clean report helps your paper move along faster.

  10. AI writing detection journal

    A lot of journals want AI use disclosed, and authors stay responsible for the content.

How JMVRA Fits In

JMVRA is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Following the discontinuation of the UGC and UGC-CARE journal listing, and in alignment with the latest UGC-CARE recommendations and guidelines, JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals. UGC public notice (PDF)

Every submission to JMVRA is screened for similarity ahead of peer review, which means papers arriving with a clean, properly cited report go on to reviewers without holdup.

ISSN
2984-8911 (online) · publishing since June 2023
Issues
Monthly issues across many disciplines
Review
Two-way anonymous review by specialists
Access
Open access, licensed CC BY 4.0
Fee
₹971 INR for Indian and $41 USD for foreign authors, due only after acceptance
DOI
Crossref — available as an optional extra
Indexing
Google Scholar has it; it is not in Scopus, Web of Science or DOAJ
Impact factor
11.25, derived from Google Scholar data

Screening begins the moment a paper arrives and each decision is sent as soon as it is reached, yet JMVRA never promises a set number of days: actual review time depends on the reviewers and on how much revision the paper needs.

At-a-Glance Checklist

  1. Report readMatch by match
  2. Quotes markedAnd cited
  3. Self-reuse citedEarlier papers
  4. AI use disclosedIf used
  5. JMVRA limitBelow 15%

Repeating Your Own Earlier Work

Thesis text

Disclose it; reuse can be fine when cited.

Preprints

Normally fine, but declare them.

Earlier papers

Reword and cite; do not recycle text.

Methods text

A degree of reuse is normal; cite where it came from.

Checks to Make Prior to Submission

  1. Use your institution’s checker where one exists — ask the library or research office
  2. Examine the sources, not only the figure — which passages are matching?
  3. Reword and cite — put matched passages in your own language
  4. Stay below 15% — the JMVRA threshold

Practical Tips for Handling a Similarity Report Calmly

A similarity report is a map of matching text, not a verdict. These tips help you read it sensibly, correct genuine problems and explain legitimate overlap to an editor.

  • Read the matches, not the headline figure. Open the report and look at which passages match and from which sources. A few long matches from one source matter far more than many tiny scattered ones.
  • Paraphrase by understanding. Close the source, explain the idea in your own words from memory, then check accuracy and cite. Swapping synonyms in the original sentence is still too close and often remains flagged.
  • Quote sparingly and mark it. Use direct quotation only when exact wording matters, enclose it in quotation marks and give the citation. Standard methods text and reference lists often match harmlessly.
  • Declare reuse of your own work. If a section builds on your thesis or earlier paper, say so in the manuscript and cover letter. Open disclosure is much better received than discovery by the editor.
  • Check early, with time to revise. Run the check on a near-final draft, leaving days to fix problems rather than hours. Rushed rewriting can introduce errors and inconsistent citation.

Use the report as a diagnostic tool: inspect each match, rewrite from understanding, cite properly and disclose any overlap with your own earlier work.

Questions Researchers Often Ask

Q1. Is it possible to test similarity ahead of submission?
Yes. A lot of universities give access to Turnitin or iThenticate via the library.
Q2. Does 20% similarity automatically mean rejection?
Not always; editors consider what was matched and the reason.
Q3. If I cite the source, is copying fine?
Extended word-for-word passages need quotation marks along with a citation, and they ought to be uncommon.
Q4. Will my paper overlap with my thesis?
Frequently, when the thesis is available online; reword the text and disclose the link.
Q5. Is a free checker the same as Turnitin?
No. Each draws on different databases, so the outcomes may differ.
Q6. Is text from my thesis treated as plagiarism?
Disclose it; reuse with a citation may be acceptable, but confirm with the journal first.

How Transparent Peer Review Works, Stage by Stage

  1. SubmissionInitial checks cover plagiarism, formatting and scope.
  2. Reviewer assignmentExperts in the subject are allocated via the Scholar9 portal.
  3. Double-blind reviewReviewers judge originality, method, significance and clarity.
  4. DecisionThe outcome (accept, revise or reject) is communicated by email and WhatsApp.
  5. RevisionEach reviewer comment gets a point-by-point reply from the authors.
  6. TransparencyThe review record is on Scholar9, and a report is available on request.

The three transparency models are open reports, optional reviewer identity and open participation; see how JMVRA applies them.

Ready to Publish? Submit to JMVRA

2984-8911Online ISSN · publishing since June 2023
11.25Impact factor · from Google Scholar citations
₹971 INR / $41 USDBilled only after an acceptance decision
Double-blindOpen and transparent peer review
CC BY 4.0Free access, no embargo
On requestCrossref DOI

JMVRA is aligned with UGC's Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.

JMVRA is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Following the discontinuation of the UGC and UGC-CARE journal listing, and in alignment with the latest UGC-CARE recommendations and guidelines, JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.

Key Terms

Subjects and search phrases this article addresses.

Turnitin checked journal acceptable similarity percentage for journal iThenticate vs Turnitin how to reduce similarity index self plagiarism in research paper exclude references Turnitin paraphrasing tool plagiarism thesis to journal similarity rapid publishing peer reviewed journal AI writing detection journal UGC CARE journal journal publication peer review journal Crossref DOI high impact factor peer reviewed journal transparent peer review double-blind peer review open peer review refereed journal peer review process steps

Related Reading

Further reading on the same theme from the JMVRA blog.

Keep Reading on the JMVRA Blog

This guide belongs to the JMVRA journal blog, which offers practical advice on publishing, indexing, metrics and research integrity, written to be checkable instead of promotional.

Browse all articles

Just ₹971 INR
Publish in a UGC-aligned peer-reviewed journal · ₹971 INR Indian authors · $41 USD international · Impact Factor 11.25
Submit Paper