Scope match
Your manuscript topic and article type fit the journal’s published aims and scope.
Peer Review, Refereed, Indexed, Multidisciplinary, Multilanguage, UGC CARE Approved Parameters Aligned, Open Access Journal Call for Paper All Policy Track Journal List WhatsApp Email
Affordable publishing can be credible—but a low fee, DOI badge or old UGC CARE claim is never enough on its own. Use this evidence-first checklist before you submit or pay.

If you are a student, PhD scholar, researcher or faculty member searching for an affordable journal in India, you will repeatedly see phrases such as “UGC CARE,” “peer reviewed,” “Scopus indexed,” “DOI” and “impact factor.” They sound reassuring, but each has a different meaning—and every important claim should be verified independently.
Publication fees also vary widely. Some journals are supported by universities or societies, some charge authors, and others combine subscriptions, sponsorships and article-processing charges. A modest fee is not automatically suspicious; an expensive fee is not automatically evidence of quality. What matters is whether the journal provides a transparent editorial service, preserves the scholarly record and is suitable for your academic purpose.
Use this guide for any journal, including JMVRA. A responsible decision should survive checks outside the journal’s own website.
The phrase now needs historical context, not a fresh approval assumption.
UGC’s public notice following its 584th meeting discontinued the listing framework and moved toward suggestive parameters for selecting peer-reviewed journals. Consequently, authors should not assume that an old CARE-list appearance operates as a current, continuing UGC certification.
What to do now: assess the journal’s peer review, editorial transparency, ethics, fees, ownership, identifiers and archive; then obtain the latest written rule from the institution that will evaluate your publication.
| Question | Weak approach | Better evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Is the journal acceptable? | Trust an old “UGC approved” badge | Check current institutional rules and the journal’s verifiable practices |
| Is it indexed? | Trust logos on the homepage | Search the official source list by title and ISSN |
| Is peer review genuine? | Rely on the words “peer reviewed” | Read the policy, timeline, reviewer criteria and published corrections |
| Is the fee fair? | Compare only the headline price | Confirm the total charge, inclusions, taxes, timing and refund terms |
UGC CARE Approved Parameters Aligned
JMVRA is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Following the discontinuation of the UGC and UGC-CARE journal listing, and in alignment with the latest UGC-CARE recommendations and guidelines, JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.
No UGC journal number is quoted: UGC no longer maintains a journal list, so none exists for a journal founded after 2019. Verify the journal through its ISSN record, review policy, archive and fee page instead. UGC public notice (PDF)
Complete the same checks for every journal—whether found through search, social media, a message group or a colleague.
Your manuscript topic and article type fit the journal’s published aims and scope.
Several recent papers open correctly and show complete author, reference and publication information.
Editors are named, their affiliations are shown, and their identities can be independently checked.
The journal explains its review model, reviewer role, revision process and final decision authority.
Each indexing claim is confirmed in the database’s own source list—not only by a logo.
Published DOI links resolve correctly and their metadata matches the article.
The total fee, taxes, optional services, payment stage and refund terms are clear.
Policies cover plagiarism, authorship, conflicts, corrections, retractions and complaints.
You understand who keeps copyright and what readers may do with the published work.
Your university, department or funder confirms that the journal meets your purpose.
This score is a screening aid, not accreditation or a guarantee of institutional acceptance.
There is no universal Indian publication fee.
Charges depend on the publishing model, subject, article type, production work, open-access licence, print choices and optional author services. Instead of asking only “Which journal is cheapest?”, ask what the quoted amount includes and when payment becomes due.
Be cautious if charges appear only after acceptance, a personal payment account is used, or the journal pressures you to pay immediately. Equally, do not treat a higher fee as evidence of stronger review. Price and quality must be assessed separately.
Exact workflows vary, but authors should be able to see these stages.
Match scope, author guidelines, reference style, disclosures and research-ethics requirements.
Use the official submission channel and retain confirmation, manuscript version and correspondence.
Editors check completeness, scope, originality, ethics and baseline suitability for external review.
Qualified reviewers assess originality, method, analysis, clarity, references and contribution.
Authors answer comments point by point and explain changes or reasoned disagreements.
The outcome may be acceptance, minor revision, major revision or rejection.
After acceptance, applicable charges, proofs and publication forms are handled transparently.
The final article, metadata, persistent identifiers and correction mechanisms become accessible.
A Digital Object Identifier is a persistent identifier for a digital object. A working DOI helps identification and linking, but does not certify research quality or database coverage.
Databases and discovery services have different purposes and selection rules. Always ask “indexed where?” and verify the journal by title and ISSN on the provider’s official site.
Clarivate’s Journal Impact Factor is a specific metric in Journal Citation Reports. Other scores must be named with their provider and methodology, not presented as equivalent.
The policy should identify whether review is single-blind, double-blind, open or another stated model; how reviewers are selected; how conflicts are managed; what reviewers assess; how revisions work; and who makes the final decision. “Transparent” does not necessarily mean publishing reviewer names or reports—it means authors can understand the real process and responsibilities.
Look beyond an ethics badge. Read the journal’s rules on plagiarism and duplicate submission, authorship and contributorship, conflicts of interest, human or animal research, data availability, AI use, complaints, corrections and retractions. The archive should show that the publisher can correct the record when needed.
Open access describes reader access, not one universal copyright arrangement. Confirm whether authors retain copyright, which licence applies, how reuse is attributed and whether repository deposit is permitted. Save a copy of the terms that applied when you submitted.
Start with the purpose of the publication. A journal may be credible and still be the wrong venue for your paper, audience or institutional requirement.
If the paper is connected to a PhD submission, promotion or formal evaluation, ask the deciding office before paying. Keep its response with your publication records.
UGC discontinued the UGC-CARE listing framework in October 2024. Authors should use the current UGC suggestive parameters and confirm the specific rules of their university or authority rather than treating an old listing as current approval.
No. Price alone does not prove quality or lack of quality. Evaluate peer review, editorial identity, ethics, archives, indexing claims, fees and institutional acceptance together.
No. A DOI is a persistent identifier. It does not itself establish quality or inclusion in any particular indexing database. Verify coverage in each database directly.
No. Google Scholar is a broad discovery service. Visibility there is not the same as selection by a curated citation database, and it does not certify peer-review quality.
Follow the journal’s published payment policy. For JMVRA, authors should consult the current publication-charge page and payment terms; never pay an unofficial account or contact.
Ask your university, department, research cell or other deciding authority for its current written requirements. Journal suitability for one purpose does not guarantee acceptance for another.
An archived status may be described only with its historical date and context. It should not be presented as a current UGC endorsement after the list was discontinued.
External databases and institutional rules change. Re-check them at the time you submit; this guide is educational information, not a certification or guarantee.
Every UGC notice and list held on this site, with the file size read from the document itself. Each one is embedded below — no click needed.
Every item this guide tells you to verify, stated here for this journal so you can check it against the policy pages rather than take it on trust.
JMVRA is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Following the discontinuation of UGC and UGC-CARE journal listing, JMVRA is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals.
Since the CARE listing was discontinued on 3 October 2024 there is no current list for any journal to appear on. What exists instead is a published set of parameters, and each of the ones below is evidenced on this site — check them the same way this guide tells you to check any journal.
See how JMVRA meets each parameter · Peer review policy · Editorial board · Publication ethics · Open access · DOI · Charges
Apply every check in this guide to us. Review our scope, peer-review policy, editorial board, archive, ethics and current charges before you decide.